1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 62 Ohio
  5. 62 Ohio St.3d 253 (1991)
 

STATE v. BROUGHTON

No. 91-742.

62 Ohio St.3d 253 (1991)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BROUGHTON, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 18, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald W. White, Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel J. Breyer and David H. Hoffmann, for appellant.

Walker, Bradford & Hill and D. Vincent Faris, for appellee.

HOLMES, J.

The primary issue before the court is whether the time in which to bring Broughton to trial on his second indictment had expired, pursuant to Ohio's speedy-trial statute. For the reasons that follow, we answer such query in the negative.

I

Speedy-Trial Computation

The key fact we must discern from the record in this case is how much time had run against the state pursuant to R.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases