1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 306 S.C.
  5. 306 S.C. 9 (1991)
 

STATE v. AUSTIN

1706

306 S.C. 9 (1991)

409 S.E.2d 811

The STATE, Respondent v. Steven Columbus AUSTIN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided October 7, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Asst. Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for appellant.

Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, and Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., Columbia, and Sol. Holman C. Gossett, Jr., Spartanburg, for respondent.

Heard Sept. 10, 1991.

Decided Oct. 7, 1991.

SANDERS, Chief Judge:

Defendant Steven Columbus Austin appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the trial judge erred in admitting certain evidence seized by the police as the result of a search. We remand.

I.

THE ISSUES

The evidence in question, a quantity of marijuana, was seized following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases