COOPER, Judge.
Appellant and his co-defendant were convicted by a jury of armed robbery.
1. Appellant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial because the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The evidence construed in favor of the verdict shows that appellant and his co-defendant went to a pool hall owned by the victim and played pool. As the victim racked the balls for the third
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
