IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF CROOK

Docket No. B042258.

235 Cal.App.3d 30 (1991)

286 Cal. Rptr. 537

In re the Marriage of RAYVESTA and JASPER CROOK. RAYVESTA CROOK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JASPER CROOK, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

October 17, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Levin & Margolin, Lionel P. Levin and William J. Cleary, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Bleavans & Greenberg, Robert E. Blevans and Mariellen Yarc for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

ASHBY, J.

In this case we hold that a client is bound by her attorney's written stipulation to a temporary judge in substantial compliance with rule 244, California Rules of Court.

After three postponements of the trial of this marital dissolution action due to court congestion, respondent Jasper Crook's attorney suggested to appellant Rayvesta Crook's attorney that they have the matter tried by retired Judge Earl...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases