BRAND BANKING CO. v. ROOSMAN

A90A2062.

199 Ga. App. 58 (1991)

404 S.E.2d 286

BRAND BANKING COMPANY v. ROOSMAN et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied March 14, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pruitt & Britt, Glyndon C. Pruitt, for appellant.

John F. Doran, Jr., for appellees.


BANKE, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Brand Banking Company, brought suit against the appellees, Tom Roosman and Nash Chevrolet, seeking to recover the balance owing under two promissory notes executed by Roosman, plus punitive damages for alleged fraud on the part of both defendants. The case was tried before a jury. Roosman did not file an answer or appear at trial, and a judgment was returned against him on both counts, with damages and attorney fees for the alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases