GORALSKY v. TAYLOR

No. 90-942.

59 Ohio St. 3d 197 (1991)

GORALSKY v. TAYLOR ET AL.; HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 15, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carlile, Patchen, Murphy & Allison, Laurence E. Sturtz and Jan E. Hensel, for appellant.


H. BROWN, J.

For the reasons which follow, we hold that the bank was under no obligation to disclose the existence of the trust account, and reverse the finding of contempt.

I

A judgment creditor may collect the amount of the judgment owed from the personal property of the debtor other than earnings through a proceeding commenced by the filing of an affidavit as provided by R.C. 2716.11. A written notice of garnishment is then delivered to the garnishee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases