1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 229 Cal.App.3d
  5. 229 Cal.App.3d 26 (1991)
 

POLLOCK v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. G010561.

229 Cal.App.3d 26 (1991)

279 Cal. Rptr. 634

ARTHUR J. POLLOCK et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; STEVEN A. SILVERSTEIN, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

March 13, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arthur J. Pollock, in pro. per., for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Silverstein & Huston and Mark W. Huston for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

CROSBY, J.

(1a) Plaintiff, an attorney miffed at the imposition of sanctions, attempted to recoup the loss by suing opposing counsel in a new action for breach of contract and fraud. Defendants petitioned for extraordinary relief when their demurrer and motion to strike were overruled. They are entitled to it.

I

The present lawsuit had its genesis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases