1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 24 Conn.
  5. 24 Conn. App. 230 (1991)
 

SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. v. SCHMITZ

(8849)

24 Conn. App. 230 (1991)

SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. ROBERT A. SCHMITZ ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Schmitz, pro se, and Marion B. Schmitz, pro se, the appellants (defendants).

Ellery E. Plotkin, for the appellee (plaintiff).

NORCOTT, FOTI and CRETELLA, JS.

FOTI, J.

Robert and Marion Schmitz1 appeal the trial court's ruling on their moticn to open the judgment of foreclosure by sale and to extend the sale date, and on a codefendant's motion for a stay of execution. The Schmitzes claim that the trial court improperly (1) opened the judgment of foreclosure and extended the sale date for only four weeks, and (2) refused to grant a codefendant's motion for a stay of execution. We find that these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases