RINDLEY v. GALLAGHER

No. 89-6186.

929 F.2d 1552 (1991)

Stephen RINDLEY, D.D.S., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas GALLAGHER, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Marshall Brothers, D.D.S., et al., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 30, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen C. Amlong, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Betsy E. Gallagher, Gail Leverett (f/k/a Kniskern), Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

J. Terrell Williams, Tallahassee, Fla., for Ferris, et al.

M. Stephen Smith III, Lee S. Miller, Amy Uber, Miami, Fla., for Secy., Gallagher and Lamb.

Before HATCHETT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM, Senior District Judge.


HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

In this lawsuit filed by a dentist undergoing disciplinary proceedings, we reverse the district court's dismissal of the lawsuit through the application of doctrines of abstention. 719 F.Supp. 1076.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Stephen Rindley is an advertising dentist who alleges that non-advertising dentists, as well as non-dentists who are economically dependent on non-advertising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases