In this proceeding the respondent was charged with one allegation of professional misconduct. The petitioner moves and the respondent cross-moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee.
Charge one alleged that the respondent was convicted of serious crimes, as defined in Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d). Specifically, on or about October 27, 1988, the respondent, after a trial by jury, in the Supreme...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.