MATTER OF BERGER


165 A.D.2d 71 (1991)

In the Matter of Murray Berger and Jonathan N. Boxer (Admitted as Jonathan Neil Boxer), Attorneys, Respondents. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 11, 1991


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., for petitioner.

Stern, Fixler, Wiener & Levy (Joel S. Stern of counsel), for Murray Berger, respondent.

MANGANO, P. J., THOMPSON, BRACKEN, BROWN and KUNZEMAN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

In these consolidated proceedings the respondent Berger was charged with one charge of professional misconduct and the respondent Boxer was charged with two charges of professional misconduct. The Special Referee found both of the respondents guilty of gross neglect as alleged in the first charge but failed to make a finding as to the additional charge of failure to cooperate brought against the respondent Boxer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases