FLORAL TRADE COUNCIL OF DAVIS, CAL. v. U.S.

Consol. Court No. 90-06-00290.

775 F.Supp. 1492 (1991)

FLORAL TRADE COUNCIL OF DAVIS, CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores, et al., Defendants-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

September 27, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart & Stewart, Eugene L. Stewart, Terence P. Stewart, James R. Cannon, Jr. and Jimmie V. Reyna, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Jeanne E. Davidson, (Andrea Fekkes Dynes, Office of Chief Counsel for Intern. Trade Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for defendant.

Arnold & Porter, Lawrence A. Schneider, Michael T. Shor and Susan G. Lee, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Patrick F.J. Macrory, Spencer S. Griffith, Washington, D.C., for defendants-intervenors.


OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

In this case, domestic and foreign producers of fresh cut flowers challenge the final results of the second antidumping duty review by the International Trade Administration ("ITA") in Certain Fresh Cut Flowers From Colombia, 55 Fed.Reg. 20491 (1990).1 The review covered 218 producers and exporters of flowers (standard carnations, miniature (spray) carnations, standard chrysanthemums, and pompon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases