McNEIL-PPC, INC. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

Civ. A. No. 90-B-2029.

759 F.Supp. 1505 (1991)

McNEIL-PPC, INC., Plaintiff, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Procter and Gamble Distributing Company, and Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

March 20, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick J. Baumann, Peter L. Edwards, Rothgerber, Appel, Powers & Johnson, Denver, Colo., Philip S. Johnson, Dianne B. Elderkin, Lynn B. Morreale, Woodcock Washburn Kurtz Mackiewicz & Norris, Philadelphia, Pa., for McNeil.

Allen H. Gerstein, Carl E. Moore, Jr., Marshall, O'Toole, Gerstein, Murray & Bicknell, Chicago, Ill., Fredrick H. Braun, Larry L. Huston, Procter & Gamble Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, H. Thomas Coghill, Paul E. Goodspeed, Coghill & Goodspeed, Denver, Colo., for Procter & Gamble.


FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

KANE, Senior District Judge.

BACKGROUND

McNeil-PPC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) has moved for a preliminary injunction against Procter & Gamble. P & G is introducing a product which PPC claims infringes on a PPC patent. The product is a new "ultra-thin" external feminine sanitary napkin which P & G plans to market under the brand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases