1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 772 F.Supp.
  5. 772 F.Supp. 1472 (1991)
 

U.S. v. VASTOLA

Crim. A. No. 86-301(SSB).

772 F.Supp. 1472 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America v. Gaetano VASTOLA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Chertoff, U.S. Atty. by Bruce Repetto and Marion Percell, Asst. U.S. Attys., Newark, N.J., for the U.S.

Michael Rosen, Joy Vastola, New York City (Herald Price Fahringer, Diarmuid White, of counsel), for defendant Vastola.

Rochman, Platzer, Fallick and Rosmarin by Barry M. Fallick, New York City, for defendant Saka.

OPINION

BROTMAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Prior to their trial on racketeering and extortion charges, defendants Gaetano Vastola, Elias Saka, and their co-defendants moved, inter alia, to suppress certain electronic surveillance tapes contending that the tapes had not been sealed "immediately" as required by Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ("Wiretap Act"), as amended, at 18 U.S.C. § 2510

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases