1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 922 F.2d
  5. 922 F.2d 1306 (1991)
 

HUDSON v. CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION, LOCAL NO. 1

No. 89-2493.

922 F.2d 1306 (1991)

Annie Lee HUDSON, K. Celeste Campbell, Estherlene Holme, Edna Rose McCoy, Debra Ann Petitan, Walter A. Sherrill and Beverly F. Underwood, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION, LOCAL NO. 1, Robert M. Healey, Jacqueline B. Vaughn, Rochelle D. Hart, Thomas H. Reece, Glendis Hambrick, Individually and as Officers of the Chicago Teachers Union, Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Illinois, Raoul Villalobos, Martha Jantho, Thomas Corcoran, Betty Bonow, Sol Brandzel, Clark Burrus, Leon Jackson, Rose Mary Janus, Dr. Wilfred Reid, Myrna Salazar, Dr. Luis Salces and Viola Thomas, Individually and as Officers and Members of the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Illinois, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis E. Bulkeley, John V. Ryan, III, Rooks, Pitts & Poust, Margaret S. Garvey, Freeborn & Peters, Chicago, Ill., Edwin Vieira, Jr., Manassas, Va., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stephen B. Horwitz, S. Leslie Kleiman, Joseph M. Jacobs, Charles Orlove, Jacobs, Burns, Sugarman & Orlove, Wayne B. Giampietro, Lawrence A. Poltrock, Witwer, Burlage, Poltrock & Giampietro, Chicago, Ill., Laurence Gold, David S. Silberman, Washington, D.C., Thomas P. Brown, P. Kevin Connelly, Jody Wilner, Michael J. Sheehan, Connelly, Sheehan & Moran, Robert A. Wolf, John L. Wren, Patricia J. Whitten, Board of Educ. of the City of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Before COFFEY and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, nonunion teachers, filed a suit against the Chicago Teachers Union and the Chicago Board of Education that challenged the constitutionality of the procedural scheme employed by the Union to collect "fair share fees"1 from their non-union employees. In Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292, 106 S.Ct. 1066, 89 L.Ed.2d 232 (1986), the Supreme Court held...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases