UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
Sidney Williams, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors,
v.
The CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, et al., Defendants,
Gordon M. Ledbetter and John D. Shumway, Defendant-Intervenors.
Carolyn JORDAN, etc., et al., Plaintiffs,
Sandra M. Pierce-Hanna, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors,
v.
John WILSON, etc., et al., Defendants,
Gordon M. Ledbetter and John D. Shumway, Defendant-Intervenors.
United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 3, 1991.
October 3, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Marybeth Martin, Philip Eure, Employment Litigation Section, Civ. Rights Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.
Donald Watkins, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-intervenor Williams.
Thomas M. Goggans, Montgomery, Ala., for white male police officers of the City of Montgomery, and Ledbetter, defendants-intervenors.
Kenneth L. Thomas, Massey, Means & Thomas, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-intervenors Williams, et al.
Vanzetta McPherson, Montgomery, Ala., for Timmi Alford re challenge to appointment.
J. Richard Cohen and M. Wayne Sabel, Argo, Enslen, Holloway & Sabel, Montgomery, Ala., for Pierce & Oyler.
Robert C. Black and Randall C. Morgan, Hill, Hill, Carter, Franco, Cole & Black, Montgomery, Ala., for all defendants except Wade L. Moss and Montgomery City-County Personnel Bd.
Robert D. Segall, Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, Montgomery, Ala., for Wade L. Moss and Montgomery City-County Personnel Bd.
George B. Azar, Azar & Azar, Montgomery, Ala., for defendants, Folmar, Wilson, McGilvray, Eckerman, Cooper & Duffee.
Julian McPhillips and Kenneth Shinbaum, McPhillips, DeBardelaben & Hawthorne, Montgomery, Ala., for Willie Davis re challenge to appointment.
Gary E. Atchison, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-intervenor Boyd.
Theron Stokes, Montgomery, Ala., for Atty. Sabel re attorney's fees.
United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, Chief Judge.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e through 2000e-17, proscribes certain employment practices that have a "disparate impact" on employees — that is, that have a discriminatory effect but for which there is no evidence of the employer's subjective intent to discriminate. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.,401 U.S. 424,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
