ORDER
Petitioner alleges in his motion of March 22, 1991 that certain facts were overlooked by the Special Division in deciding that a portion of petitioner's attorneys' fees would not have been incurred but for the requirements of the Independent Counsel Act, that the court did not permit him to demonstrate that certain portions of his fee application will more than satisfy the statutory test, and that he is entitled to submit such facts; therefore it is
...Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
