1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 781 F.Supp.
  5. 781 F.Supp. 1400 (1991)
 

U.S. v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO.

Civ. No. 83-51-D.

781 F.Supp. 1400 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY and Nabisco Brands, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, C.D.

December 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Poole, Antitrust Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Owen M. Johnson, Jr., J. Randolph Wilson, Theodore Voorhees, Washington, D.C., Burton H. Brody, Nabisco Brands, Inc., New York City, Mark Schantz, Charles Becker, Richard Santi, Des Moines, Iowa, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

VIETOR, Chief Judge.

This is an antitrust action brought by the United States of America ("government"). The government alleges that a long-term lease agreement entered into in 1982 by which defendant Archer-Daniels-Midland Company ("ADM") leased two corn wet milling plants, one in Iowa and one in New York, from defendant Nabisco Brands, Inc. ("Nabisco") is an acquisition that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases