MID-COUNTY FUTURE v. PORT. METRO. AREA LGBC

2444, 2480, 2551, 2552, 2589, 2588, 2585, 2630, 2669, 2670, 2700, 2701, 2706, 2707, 2719, 2720, 2721, 2727, 2743, 2744, 2745, 2747, 2748, 2749, 2750, 2751, 2752, 2753, 2754, 2774, 2775, 2776, 2777, 2788, 2789, 2790, 2802, 2803, 2804, 2832, 2856, 2874; CA A47426 (Control), CA A48436, CA A50239, CA A50240, CA A60687, CA A60688, CA A60689, CA A61951, CA A62928, CA A62929, CA A63444, CA A63791, CA A63443, CA A63490, CA A63789, CA A63792, CA A63793, CA A64437, CA A64647, CA A64648, CA A64649, CA A64650, CA A64651, CA A64652, CA A64653, CA A64654, CA A64655, CA A64656, CA A64657, CA A65510, CA A66450, CA A66451, CA A66452, CA A66453, CA A66454, CA A66455, CA A66456, CA A67082, CA A67083, CA A67084, CA A67085, CA A67960.

809 P.2d 1354 (1991)

106 Or.App. 647

MID-COUNTY FUTURE Alternatives Committee, an Oregon Corporation, Peter M. Smith and Dorothy Smith, Petitioners, v. PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION AND CITY OF GRESHAM, Respondents. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee, an Oregon Corporation, Peter M. Smith and Dorothy Smith, Petitioners, v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission and City of Portland, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 17, 1991.

Reconsideration Denied June 12, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory W. Byrne, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief was George E. Birnie, Portland.

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Com'n. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Matthew R. Baines, Asst. City Atty., Gresham, argued the cause for respondent City of Gresham. With him on the brief was Thomas Sponsler, City Atty., Gresham.

No appearance for respondent City of Portland.

Jeffrey L. Rogers, City Atty., and Adrianne Brockman, Sr. Deputy City Atty., Portland, filed a brief amicus curiae for City of Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and RIGGS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of the boundary commission's order allowing the annexation of unincorporated territory to the City of Gresham (city).

The threshold question, raised by the city, is whether petitioners have standing1 in this court. ORS 199.461(4) provides, as relevant:

"Except as provided in ORS 183.315(1), any person interested in a boundary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases