STATE v. RUSSELL

No. 18627.

835 P.2d 1326 (1991)

122 Idaho 515

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Richard RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

June 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wood & Shaw, Pocatello, for defendant-appellant. Steven G. Wood argued.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Michael Kane, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Jack B. Haycock, Deputy Attys. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent. Jack B. Haycock argued.


SILAK, Judge.

This case involves the question whether a trial court abused its discretion in revoking a defendant's probation and in amending his sentence. The court revoked defendant Russell's probation because Russell violated a condition prohibiting him from contacting his estranged wife. On appeal, Russell challenges the probation revocation and the court's denial of his I.C.R. 35 motion to reinstate probation. Russell also claims that he should not have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases