STATE v. NOBLES

No. 18174.

835 P.2d 1320 (1991)

122 Idaho 509

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William Mann NOBLES, III, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

February 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Meikle, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant. David A. Johnson, argued.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Michael A. Henderson (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.


WALTERS, Chief Judge.

William Mann Nobles III pled guilty in the district court to robbery. Pursuant to I.C.R. 11(a)(2), Nobles reserved the right to appeal and challenge the district court's order denying his motion to suppress his confession to the robbery. On appeal, Nobles contends that the confession should have been suppressed because he was not given timely Miranda warnings. Nobles also submits that he was coerced into making the confession. For the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases