SAIF v. WRIGHT

WCB TP-88016; CA A51030; SC S37533.

817 P.2d 1317 (1991)

312 Or. 132

In the matter of the Compensation of Marvin C. Wright, Claimant. SAIF Corporation, Petitioner On Review, v. Marvin C. WRIGHT, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Reuling, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

David C. Force, of Vick & Gutzler, Salem, argued the cause and filed the response to the petition for respondent on review.


GRABER, Justice.

The issue in this workers' compensation case is whether ORS 656.593(3)1 gave the Workers' Compensation Board (the Board) the authority to determine whether SAIF Corporation (SAIF) was a "paying agency" within the meaning of that statute. We hold that the Board had the authority to make that determination. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, which held to the contrary.

Claimant suffered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases