U.S. v. MATSUMOTO

Crim. No. 89-01785.

756 F.Supp. 1361 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Takeo MATSUMOTO, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Hawaii.

February 11, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Bent, U.S. Atty., R. Michael Burke, Asst. U.S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff.

C. George Sphikas, Case & Lynch, Samuel P. King, Jr., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM DECISION

PENCE, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendant Takeo Matsumoto's ("Matsumoto") Motion to Dismiss Indictment ("Motion to Dismiss") presents a very novel legal argument. It seeks dismissal of the Indictment on the grounds that the visa application form, on which defendant is charged with making a fraudulent statement, was not marked with an Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number, as required by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases