1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 753 F.Supp.
  5. 753 F.Supp. 1359 (1991)
 

KESSELRING v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

No. C2-89-622.

753 F.Supp. 1359 (1991)

C. Boyd KESSELRING, Plaintiff, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D.

January 7, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Welch, Donald B. Hallowes, Welch, Hallowes & Roth Co., L.P.A., Reynoldsburg, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Bradd N. Siegel, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Columbus, Ohio, Gary L. Lieber, Patrick J. Duffy, Schmeltzer, Aptaker & Shepard, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

This matter is before the court for a decision on the motion of defendant United Technologies Corporation for summary judgment. In his response to the motion, plaintiff Kesselring has conceded that defendant is entitled to summary judgment on Count Two of the complaint, a state age discrimination claim under Ohio Revised Code § 4101.17, and on Count IV, a state law breach of contract claim. Defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases