1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 759 F.Supp.
  5. 759 F.Supp. 1337 (1991)
 

SPANGLER v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

No. IP 87-1013-C.

759 F.Supp. 1337 (1991)

Burl SPANGLER and Bonnie Spangler, Plaintiffs, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and Roper Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

March 8, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris L. Klapper, Klapper & Isaac, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiffs.

William M. Osborn, Osborn, Hiner & Lisher, Indianapolis, Ind., for defendants.

ENTRY DENYING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER INSTRUCTING PLAINTIFFS TO ELECT WHETHER THEY INTEND TO PURSUE A NEGLIGENT BREACH OF A DUTY TO WARN OR A FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT THEORY AT TRIAL

TINDER, District Judge.

On December 21, 1990, plaintiffs filed an objection to this court's order of December 11, 1990, which had required plaintiffs to elect between pursuing a negligent breach of a duty to warn or a fraudulent concealment theory at trial.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases