MILLER v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

Raymond E. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. (successor to Armstrong Cork Company, a Pennsylvania corp.); Acands, Inc., a Delaware corp.; Combustion Engineering, Inc. (successor to M.H. Detrick Company & Walsh Refractory, a Delaware corp.); Fibreboard Corporation (successor to Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., a Delaware corp.); GAF Corporation (successor to Ruberoid Corp., a Delaware corp.); National Gypsum Company, a Delaware corporation (successor to Keasby & Mattison Corp., a Delaware corp.); Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (a Delaware corp.); Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (successor to Unarco Industries, Inc.); Raymark Industries, Inc. (successor to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.); Turner & Newall, Ltd. (successor to Keasby & Mattison Corp.), a public corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom; and United States Gypsum Company, a Delaware corp., Defendants, and The Celotex Corporation (successor to Phillip-Carey Manufacturing Corp., a Delaware corp.); Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., an Ohio corp.; the Keene Corporation (successor to Baldwin-Ehert Hill Co. and Corp.); and Owens-Illinois, Inc. (successor to Owens-Illinois Glass Co., an Illinois corp.), Defendants-Appellees.