1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 61 Ohio
  5. 61 Ohio St.3d 142 (1991)
 

STATE, EX REL. COLLINS, v. O'FARRELL

No. 90-1878.

61 Ohio St.3d 142 (1991)

[THE STATE, EX REL.] COLLINS, PROS. ATTY., v. O'FARRELL, JUDGE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Collins, relator, prosecuting attorney, pro se.

Johnson & Johnson Co., L.P.A., and Robert C. Urban, Jr., Assistant Law Director, for respondent.

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and William E. Breyer, urging allowance for amicus curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.

Per Curiam.

To obtain the requested writ of prohibition, relator must show that the respondent has exercised judicial or quasi-judicial power, that the exercise of power was unauthorized by law, and that the relator has no adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Fyffe, v. Pierce (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 8, 531 N.E.2d 673. Respondent's order is plainly an exercise of judicial power, and he concedes that relator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases