STATE v. BELCHER

10-89-05433; CA A64841.

816 P.2d 1215 (1991)

108 Or.App. 741

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Douglas Gene BELCHER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 11, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Smith, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Robert J. Smith, P.C., Eugene.

Kaye E. Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b), claiming that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

Defendant was driving in a merge lane approaching Highway 126. He failed to signal as he entered the driving lane of the highway. An officer, who was following defendant, saw that and stopped him. If the Motor Vehicle Code obligated defendant to signal while entering the driving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases