1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 782 F.Supp.
  5. 782 F.Supp. 1240 (1991)
 

VAN SCHOUWEN v. CONNAUGHT CORP.

No. 91 C 1926.

782 F.Supp. 1240 (1991)

Neal VAN SCHOUWEN, Plaintiff, v. The CONNAUGHT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

October 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. Brohman, Hilda Constance Contreras, Kamensky & Rubinstein, Lincolnwood, Ill., for plaintiff.

Lawrence M. Liebman, Jeffrey Stewart Firestone, Jeffrey Lawrence Epstein, Ruth P. Walz, James S. Koehler, Firestone, Gearhart & Liebman, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

I. Introduction

A. Background

Plaintiff, Neal Van Schouwen, has moved this court to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) the counterclaim brought by the defendant, The Connaught Corporation ("Connaught"). He has also moved under Rule 12(f) to strike many of the numerous affirmative defenses that Connaught has pleaded in its answer.

Van Schouwen is a former shareholder, officer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases