1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 59 Ohio
  5. 59 Ohio St. 3d 142 (1991)
 

RENNER v. TUSCARAWAS CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 90-973.

59 Ohio St. 3d 142 (1991)

RENNER ET AL., APPELLEES, v. TUSCARAWAS COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wesp & Osterkamp Co., L.P.A., and E. Joel Wesp, for appellees.

Teaford, Rich, Belskis, Coffman & Wheeler and Jeffrey A. Rich, for appellants.

Per Curiam.

First, as to the jurisdictional question, the board argues that an appellant must file a complete copy of the notice of appeal with it to vest the BTA with jurisdiction. The Renners respond that the documents they filed with the board sufficiently advised the board of the nature and substance of the appeal. We agree with the Renners.

In Akron Standard Div. v. Lindley (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 10

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases