1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 937 F.2d
  5. 937 F.2d 1077 (1991)
 

U.S. v. LASH

Nos. 90-1449 to 90-1451 and 90-1500.

937 F.2d 1077 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul LASH (90-1449), Richard Tommasi (90-1450), Lawrence Dresner (90-1451), and Carol Ross (90-1500), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 26, 1991.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied September 3, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith Corbett, Asst. U.S. Atty., Sheldon Light (argued), Patricia L. Blake, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Harold Gurewitz (argued), Dise & Gurewitz, David S. Steingold (argued), Detroit, Mich., Joel Hoffman, William J. Weinstein (argued), Weinstein, Gordon & Hoffman, Southfield, Mich., John R. Minock (argued), Kelley & Cramer, Ann Arbor, Mich., for defendants-appellants.

Before KEITH and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in Nos. 90-1449 and 90-1450 September 3, 1991.

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Paul Lash ("Lash"), Richard Tommasi ("Tommasi"), and Lawrence Dresner ("Dresner") appeal from their April 6, 1990, judgments of conviction and sentences for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendant Carol Ross ("Ross") appeals from her April 26, 1990...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases