YOUNG v. C.I.R.

Nos. 89-6213, 89-6231 and 89-6246.

926 F.2d 1083 (1991)

Robert S. YOUNG and Kimberly C. Young, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Osvaldo DIAZ and Zoraida Diaz, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Jorge EGURROLA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Ann WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. John L. WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Osvaldo DIAZ, M.D., P.A., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Steven GOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Harold GOLD and Helen Gold, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Thomas O. GENTSCH and Betty F. Gentsch, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Edward ROSENGARTEN and Katherine Rosengarten, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Allen J. COHEN and Dorothy E. Cohen, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Lamont, Neiman & Feuerman, P.A., Jan S. Neiman, Miami, Fla., for petitioners-appellants and No. 89-6231.

Theodore F. Brill, Planation, Fla., for petitioners-appellants and No. 89-6213.

Steven S. Brown, Leigh D. Roadman, Silets & Martin, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners-appellants and No. 89-6246.

Peter K. Scott, Acting Chief Counsel, IRS, Shirley D. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Gary R. Allen, Chief, Joan I. Oppenheimer, Brian C. Griffin, David I. Pincus, Appellate Section, Tax Div., Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge.


DYER, Senior Circuit Judge:

Three sets of taxpayers1 seek review of tax court decisions denying their petitions for redetermination of deficiencies with respect to losses claimed on investments in computer equipment leasing activities. The tax court concluded that a portion of the claimed losses under long-term installment partial recourse notes used to purchase equipment were in substance nonrecourse obligations and subject to a loss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases