THOMAS v. THOMAS

No. 18538.

809 P.2d 1188 (1991)

119 Idaho 709

Brett Randall THOMAS, Plaintiff-Respondent-Respondent on Appeal, v. Margo Denise THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant-Appellant on Appeal.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

April 30, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderson, Pike & Bush, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant-appellant on appeal. Edward W. Pike argued.

Blaser & Sorensen, Blackfoot, for plaintiff-respondent-respondent on appeal. Murray J. Sorensen argued.


SILAK, Judge.

Margo Thomas appeals from an order of the district court affirming an order of the magistrate denying her I.R.C.P. 60(b) motion for relief from a divorce decree. The motion for relief asserted that division of the parties' property needed to be modified because of an incorrect estimate of their income tax liability during the year preceding the decree of divorce. Margo argues that the magistrate's conclusion that there was no mistake of fact as to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases