TAYLOR v. U.S.

No. C-1-90-202.

782 F.Supp. 1207 (1991)

Viea M. TAYLOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

September 9, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul David Rattermann, Thomas Henry Clark, Clark & Eyrich, L.P.A., Michael E. Neiheisel, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Nicholas John Pantel and Gerald Francis Kaminski, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Cincinnati, Ohio, Henry J. Riordan, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D.C., for defendant.


FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ROBERT A. STEINBERG, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case is before the Court following a trial to the Court and post trial briefs. Plaintiff Viea M. Taylor, in her personal capacity and as executrix of the estate of her late husband Francis K. Taylor, and the estate itself, sued for a refund of federal income taxes. The parties unanimously consented to trial and entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases