COUNTY OF OAKLAND BY KUHN v. CITY OF DETROIT

No. 84-71068.

776 F.Supp. 1211 (1991)

The COUNTY OF OAKLAND, by George W. KUHN, the Oakland County Drain Commissioner, Plaintiff, and County of Macomb, by Thomas S. Welsh, Macomb County Public Work's Commissioner, Intervening Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF DETROIT, Coleman A. Young, Charles Beckham, Nancy Allevato, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Michael J. Ferrantino, Sr., Darralyn Bowers, Sam Cusenza, Joseph Valentini, Charles Carson, Walter Tomyn, Vista Disposal, Inc., Michigan Disposal, Inc., Wayne Disposal, Inc., Wolverine Disposal, Inc., and Wolverine Disposal-Detroit, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

October 24, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Hurlbert, Jon R. Steiger, Dickinson Wright Moon VanDusen & Freeman, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., and Philip G. Tannian, Philip G. Tannian, P.C., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff County of Oakland.

James A. Smith, Bodman Longley & Dahling, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff County of Macomb.

S. Allen Early, III, Miller Canfield Paddock & Stone, Detroit, Mich., for defendant Coleman A. Young.

Leland Prince, Bell & Gardner, P.C., Detroit, Mich., for defendant City of Detroit.

Kenneth M. Zorn, Reynolds Beeby & Magnuson, Detroit, Mich., for defendant Charles Beckham.

David N. Zacks, Robert S. Harrison & Assoc., Birmingham, Mich., for defendants Michigan Disposal, Inc. and Walter Tomyn.

William W. Misterovich, Macomb County Public Works, Mount Clemens, Mich., for defendant Macomb County.

Dennis O. McLain, McLain & Winters, P.C., Ypsilanti, Mich., for defendants Sam Cusenza, Wolverine Disposal, Inc., Wolverine Disposal-Detroit, Inc.

N.C. Deday Larene, Detroit, Mich., for defendant Darralyn Bowers.

Richard E. Zuckerman and Honigman Miller, Detroit, Mich., for defendants Nancy Allevato, Charles Carson and Wayne Disposal, Inc. and Joseph Valentini.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

This case involves an allegedly fraudulent scheme to obtain one public contract for sewage disposal services without competitive bidding and to maintain and extend an earlier public contract on favorable terms without open price competition. This alleged fraudulent scheme caused damage to the Counties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases