1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 804 P.2d
  5. 804 P.2d 1174 (1991)
 

VENEER v. EMPLOYMENT DIV.

89-AB-1056; CA A62039.

804 P.2d 1174 (1991)

105 Or. App. 198

Sun VENEER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION and David R. Schafer, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Resubmitted December 12, 1990.

Decided January 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis T. Barnwell, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jonathan T. Harnish, Kathryn M. Hindman and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, P.C., Portland.

Meg Reeves, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Div. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

No appearance for respondent David R. Schafer.

Resubmitted In Banc December 12, 1990.

RIGGS, Judge.

The Employment Appeals Board held that claimant's discharge was not for "misconduct connected with work," ORS 657.176(2)(a); OAR 471-030-038(3), and that he is therefore entitled to receive unemployment benefits. Employer seeks review, and we affirm.

EAB found that claimant worked for employer from 1979 to 1989 and was last employed as a chipper operator. In 1987, while working for employer, claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases