IN THE MATTER OF JANISCH v. LANE CO.

88-11489; CA A63384.

806 P.2d 1164 (1991)

106 Or. App. 218

In the Matter of the Compensation of Marjorie Janisch, Claimant. Marjorie JANISCH, Petitioner, v. LANE CO. S-D # 45 and SAIF Corp., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 6, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Dale C. Johnson and Malagon, Moore & Johnson, Eugene.

Katherine H. Waldo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board affirming the decision of the referee that she is not permanently and totally disabled. Because the Board's opinion contains an inconsistency, we reverse it and remand for reconsideration.

The Board adopted the referee's finding that claimant is not totally disabled because of physical impairment alone, but because of a combination of medical and non-medical factors...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases