FAY v. CITY OF PORTLAND

TC A8711-06906; CA A50271; SC S36751.

804 P.2d 1155 (1991)

311 Or. 68

Jennifer FAY and Ginevra Fay-Babb, by Robert Babb, her Guardian Ad Litem, Petitioners on Review, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; and Anthony Lee Hough, Defendants (below), and The County of Multnomah, a political subdivision, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reassigned May 7, 1990.

Decided January 17, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cynthia Cumfer, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

J. Michael Doyle, Asst. County Counsel for Multnomah County, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response to the petition was Laurence Kressell, County Counsel for Multnomah County, Portland.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and CARSON, JONES, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY and UNIS, JJ.


UNIS, Justice.

At issue in this case is whether plaintiffs' claims for personal injury against defendant Multnomah County (county) are barred by absolute judicial immunity. The trial court granted summary judgment for the county1 on plaintiffs' first and third claims for relief and directed entry of a judgment pursuant to ORCP 67 B.2 The Court of Appeals determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases