1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 941 F.2d
  5. 941 F.2d 1010 (1991)
 

INTERSTATE MARKINGS v. MINGUS CONSTRUCTORS

No. 89-16706.

941 F.2d 1010 (1991)

INTERSTATE MARKINGS, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MINGUS CONSTRUCTORS, INC., an Arizona corporation, et al., Defendant-counter-plaintiff-Appellee, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, et al., Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Downey and Scott E. Boehm, Rake, Copple, Downey & Black, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant.

Guy W. Bluff, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-counter-plaintiff-appellee.

Before HUG and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and ATKINS, District Judge.

HUG, Circuit Judge:

In this contract diversity action, appellants Interstate Markings, Inc. and its bonding company, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, appeal the district court's judgment following a jury trial in favor of general contractor Mingus Constructors, Inc. Appellants contend that the jury's first verdict was ambiguous and that the district court erred when it recalled and reinstructed the jury prior to its second verdict. Appellants also contend that ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases