ECKIS v. LINN COUNTY

90-132; CA A71734.

821 P.2d 1127 (1991)

110 Or.App. 309

Ralph ECKIS, Karen Eckis, Frank McCoy, Annie McCoy, Robert Parrish, Sharon Parrish, Carl S. Yaillen, Patricia Frederic and Richard Frederic, Respondents, v. LINN COUNTY, Respondent, and G & G Rock Quarry, Inc., Merlyn E. Bentley and Helen Bentley, Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 18, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Schwindt, Canby, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Reif & Reif, Canby.

Charles H. Combs, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondents Ralph Eckis, Karen Eckis, Frank McCoy, Annie McCoy, Robert Parrish, Sharon Parrish, Carl S. Yaillen, Patricia Frederic and Richard Frederic.

No appearance for respondent Linn County.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's remand of a comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permit granted by Linn County. The county decisions would have allowed petitioners to conduct aggregate extraction and processing operations on a 10-acre site.

Petitioners assign 15 errors, but they entail only two issues that warrant discussion. In their first assignment, petitioners assert that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases