MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF SCHMIDT

88C-32137; CA A64338.

813 P.2d 1129 (1991)

108 Or.App. 110

In the matter of the Marriage of Carl N. SCHMIDT, Respondent, AND Barbara Schmidt, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 3, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Saucy, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Russell Lipetsky and Saucy & Lipetzky, Salem.

Mark L.B. Wheeler, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Wife appeals a judgment of dissolution. The only contention that we address is that her equalizing judgment against husband for $63,884, payable in five years, should bear interest until paid. Husband argues that the court's deferment of interest for three years was part of its "just and proper" division of property, pursuant to ORS 107.105(1)(f) and ORS 82.010(2)(a).1

In Moen and Moen, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases