1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 930 F.2d
  5. 930 F.2d 972 (1991)
 

MOURADIAN v. JOHN HANCOCK COMPANIES

No. 90-1993.

930 F.2d 972 (1991)

Raymond R. MOURADIAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. The JOHN HANCOCK COMPANIES, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided April 25, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond R. Mouradian on brief, pro se.

Jay L. Seibert and Hart and Lamond, P.C. on brief, for defendants-appellees Middlesex Ins. Co., Sentry Ins. Co. and Frank Ballard.

Charles I. Cohen, Jonathan R. Mook, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak and Stewart, Joseph F. Ryan and Lyne, Woodworth & Evarts on brief, for defendants-appellees The John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., et al.

Richard Roesel, Warren H. Pyle and Angoff, Goldman, Manning, Pyle, Wanger & Hiatt, P.C. on brief, for defendants-appellees The United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union, AFL-CIO, CLC.

Before TORRUELLA, SELYA and CYR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the limitations period applicable to a "hybrid" Section 301 action, filed by the appellant against his former employer and the union that represented him at his former job, is governed by the military-service tolling provision contained in Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(b), or by Section 205 of the Soldiers' and Sailors'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases