Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b), assigning error to the trial court's failure to give a jury instruction on the defense of entrapment.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
STATE v. SMITH
813 P.2d 1086 (1991)
107 Or.App. 647
STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Richard Kyle SMITH, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lawrence Matasar, Portland, argued the cause, for appellant. With him on the brief, were Karen A. Steele and Hoffman, Matasar & Glaeser, Portland.
Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.