1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 227 Cal.App.3d
  5. 227 Cal.App.3d 1657 (1991)
 

McCOY v. HEARST CORP.

Docket No. A045724.

227 Cal.App.3d 1657 (1991)

278 Cal. Rptr. 596

FRANK McCOY et al Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HEARST CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

March 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Charles O. Morgan, Jr., and Paul Kleven for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Walter R. Allan, Jerome C. Dougherty, Craig E. Stewart, Margaret C. Crosby, Alan L. Schlosser, Edward M. Chen, Matthew A. Coles and Arthur Brunwasser for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

HANING, J.

Appellants, two police officers and an assistant district attorney, obtained judgments in their libel actions against respondents — a newspaper and two of its reporters. The California Supreme Court reversed the judgments without directions, for insufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court then entered judgment for respondents and dismissed the actions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases