DINOCENZO v. AITKEN

No. 2 CA-CV 91-0146.

171 Ariz. 17 (1991)

827 P.2d 478

Ronald Joseph DINOCENZO, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William James AITKEN, as representative of those Underwriters at Lloyds, London and insurance companies subscribing to Insurance Policy Number 84-X0187, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Reconsideration Denied December 11, 1991.

Review Denied April 21, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Pitt & McAnally by Philip J. Hall and Jonathan Reich, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth, & Beshears by W. Lloyd Benner, Phoenix, and Adler, Kaplan & Begy by Richard F. Baylaender and John B. Austin, Chicago, for defendants/appellees.


OPINION

LIVERMORE, Chief Judge.

Cargomaster, an air cargo carrier operating from the Anchorage, Alaska airport, was insured by defendant Underwriters at Lloyds, London. At issue in this case is whether a Lloyds policy provided coverage for an injury caused plaintiff Ronald Dinocenzo by Cargomaster's negligent maintenance of a C-133 carcass at a location in the Arizona desert. The trial court found that it did not. We disagree and reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases