1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 814 P.2d
  5. 814 P.2d 1060 (1991)
 

SETO v. TRI-COUNTY METRO. TRANSP. DIST.

LUBA 91-045, SC S38056.

814 P.2d 1060 (1991)

311 Or. 456

Peter SETO and Henry Kane, Petitioners, v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided July 5, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Kane, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the petition pro se and on behalf of petitioner Seto.

Mark Greenfield, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief, were Edward J. Sullivan and Preston Thorgrimson Shidler Gates & Ellis, Portland.

GRABER, Justice.

This case concerns the siting by the Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met)1 of the Westside Corridor Project (the Project), the Portland metropolitan region's light rail extension. The 1991 Legislative Assembly enacted Senate Bill 573 (Or. Laws 1991, ch. 3) (the Act), which establishes an exclusive, speedy siting process for the Project. SB 573, §§ 1, 3. The Act places review of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases