1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 932 F.2d
  5. 932 F.2d 939 (1991)
 

ACOUSTICAL DESIGN v. CONTROL ELECTRONICS CO.

No. 90-1296

932 F.2d 939 (1991)

ACOUSTICAL DESIGN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONTROL ELECTRONICS COMPANY, INC., Insul-Art Acoustics Corp., Jack Leonard, and Harold Goldstein, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Mentlik, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, of Westfield, N.J., argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were John R. Nelson and Roy H. Wepner.

Robert J. Eichelburg, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, of Garden City, N.Y., argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were William C. Roch and Stephen D. Murphy.

Before RICH, ARCHER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Control Electronics Company, Inc. (Control), Insul-Art Acoustics Corp., Jack Leonard, and Harold Goldstein (collectively appellants) appeal the March 30, 1990, judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Civ. No. 86-1692, holding appellants liable for infringement of appellee's patents and breach of contract, and enjoining them from further infringement of the patents. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases