1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 234 Cal.App.3d
  5. 234 Cal.App.3d 1630 (1991)
 

LIPPMAN v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B052715.

234 Cal.App.3d 1630 (1991)

286 Cal. Rptr. 406

DONALD LIPPMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

October 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Gronemeier & Barker and Dale L. Gronemeier for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Julie P. Downey, Assistant City Attorney, Dov S. Lesel, Deputy City Attorney, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, R. Bruce Tepper, Jr., Kathryn Reimann and John V. Leary for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

Appellants appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate compelling the City of Los Angeles and its community redevelopment agency to fund and consult with the project area committee in the implementation of the Hollywood Redevelopment Project. We ordered the appeals consolidated. For the reasons set forth, we affirm the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

The Project Area Committee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases