RITTENHOUSE v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. C011854.

235 Cal.App.3d 1584 (1991)

1 Cal. Rptr.2d 595

WILMA M. RITTENHOUSE, as Administrator, etc., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

November 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Candace A. Fry for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Downey, Brand, Seymour & Rohwer, Whitney F. Washburn and Lawrence T. Woodlock for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

PUGLIA P.J.

Wilma M. Rittenhouse (petitioner) is the administrator of the estate of Albert Leonard White (Albert). Petitioner moved in the superior court to quash several deposition subpoenas issued and served by real party in interest Leland Stanford Junior University (Stanford) seeking Albert's medical records in the hands of hospitals and physicians. The motion to quash was denied. Petitioner contends that disclosure of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases