1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 586 A.2d
  5. 586 A.2d 1232 (1991)
 

SPICKLER v. GREENBERG

586 A.2d 1232 (1991)

Robert D. SPICKLER et al. v. Leo GREENBERG et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided February 19, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Spickler, Phippsburg, pro se.

Jonathan Piper, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, Portland, for Marcus and Plumb.

Peter DeTroy, Jonathan Brogan, Norman, Hanson & Detroy, Portland, for Greenberg.

Joseph J. Hahn, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, for Flynns.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, COLLINS and BRODY, JJ.

BRODY, Justice.

Robert D. Spickler and Olive S. Spickler appeal from two summary judgments entered against them in the Superior Court (Cumberland County) on their complaint seeking damages for perjury.1 The Spicklers contend that summary judgment was precluded by the existence of genuine issues of material fact. We agree and vacate the summary judgment as to Defendant Leo Greenberg, but we disagree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases